the t.bone SC 400

To give you a bit of an introduction, I've been working in broadcasting for 27 years. This is my first full-range, studio-use condenser microphone; though I've used some that weren't my own. I've owned and used dynamic microphones pretty much all my life. I've used some good and some bad; some dirt cheap, and some at the top of the price list for their purpose. The expensive ones weren't always the best, but at the same time, the cheap ones weren't always the best, either.

My voice has a very de-nasal bump right around 800Hz, and between the frequency response of those mics and the ability I (or whoever's engineering) have to EQ them with whatever they're plugged into, it can be very hard to make them sound like my unamplified voice does to the average ear. In fact, the microphone that I had plugged in to my chain before I received the SC 400 required TWO bands on my parametric EQ to be set to 800Hz and cranked WAY down.

I plugged in the t.bone SC 400 and reset my entire EQ to zero. I was prepared to test it out as long as it took to get it right.

It took thirty seconds.

All I need is one band at 800Hz turned down to about 25%, and this things sounds BEAUTIFUL. Crisp highs -- I actually had to back those down a little, too, but not by much -- perfect low end, not a single other thing adjusted to compensate. Never in my life has it been that simple. The SC 400 sounds very natural, it's very sensitive, and I have been thoroughly enjoying every moment with it.

I'm using it for home voiceover recording and, eventually, podcasting and radio. In fact, as I type this, I just moments ago ordered a mixer and audio interface right here at Thomann in preparation for that.

I don't have any "cons" to give you, but as many people seem to be buying this as an entry-level studio condenser (as I did) and likely need some help adjusting, let me give you a couple of notes:

Sensitivity is going to be the first thing you notice, because the SC 400 has plenty of it. If you're not familiar with how to read sensitivity figures for microphones, I'll just give you the basic idea: where you see "dB re 1V/PA," the higher the number in that spec, the more sensitive the microphone is. The SC 400 is rated at -32.6 dB in that category. One of my other microphones, the Audio-Technica PRO 61 (a dynamic), is rated at -55 dB in that category. If I switch back and forth between the two, my preamp will have to be significantly adjusted to compensate.

The SC 400 is a hypercardioid microphone, meaning the most sensitive, accurate-sounding area around it is dead-center, right in front of the diaphragm. If you move around your microphone a lot, you're going to find yourself off-axis and sounding distant rather often. This mic is generally intended for studio situations where you or your talent are stationary in front of it (such as vocal recordings or radio broadcasts). This attribute COULD be used in a live sound setting to avoid feedback, but don't forget about that sensitivity, because even if it's off-axis, it WILL still pick up sounds from all around you. In ANY setting, I highly recommend a noise gate.

Being a condenser, the SC 400 is meant to be used at a slight distance away from the mouth. You don't want to eat this microphone, it will not do you any favors. Now, that said, I do personally keep it closer to my face, but I also keep it slightly off to the side so that the front of the diaphragm IS still pointed at my mouth, but the direct wind from my speech is passing over the TOP of the mic, not directly into it. This prevents plosives while still providing the proximity effect. In fact, I recommend that technique with ANY microphone. Old trick of the trade that seems to have been lost over the years.

Bottom line: just buy this microphone. You will not regret it.

A very nice, professional looking, entry level microphone. Bought it as a backup for the dynamic mic I've been using for podcasting and narration/voice-over.

What I found was that for its price - it doesn't feel that cheap. Sure it doesn't have many bells and whistles but it does the job.
It has a sturdy build unlike any in that price range, and the accessories (shock mount and bag) don't feel cheap either.
The sound is crisp and clean without touching the gain or adding any processing.
Sensitivity is very good to the point where I had to turn it down a bit to avoid clipping when I get overexcited, also be prepared to feel any and all reflections and reverberations in your acoustic environment.
Voice sounds vibrant, and though the proximity effect is nothing to write home about - it is there. My voice is a bit nasal but I can feel the slight differences as I adjust posture to minimize it - that's how clear it feels.
The only thing I don't like that much is the polar pattern. I tend to shuffle and I sometimes leave the sweet spot of the super-cardioid pattern and it shows in the end product. This shouldn't be a problem if you're mostly doing vocals or voice-over.

Overall it performs WAY better than expected and is perfect for a first condenser, for a backup when in a pinch, and for everyday studio work.

Pros:
* The price-quality is unmatched. See below.
* Build. At this price point it doesn't get better. It's sturdy and doesn't feel cheap like the chinese clones.
* Sound is clear and crisp.
* The baggie and shock mount are also good quality

Cons:
* If you move a lot while you record - the pattern is a a bit unforgiving. You need proper posture and positioning.
* It's QUITE sensitive to the point I had to turn the gain down to avoid clipping. Also it is a bit unforgiving if you have bad acoustics in the room/studio.

A few years ago I tried a 600EUR dynamic Shure at my friend’s studio and was underwhelmed with the outcome.
This experience stopped me from investing in an XLR mic and I just kept using my no-name USB one for „bedroom recordings”.
Found this one by a complete accident and could not believe the quality-price ratio. Did my research and finally got it just to be overwhelmed with the pure quality of this little thing.
I have a softer style of singing so condensed mic served me the best. Despite that condensed mics tend to pick up a lot of background noise, I did my trial recording while having AC and PC on + washing machine working in the next room. Still got a beautiful, rich, clean recording.

The price is unbelievable for such quality.

The t.bone SC400 is an amazing mic for this price and we've been very impressed by the sound quality. I'm no mic expert but after using a shure for studio vocal recording for a couple of years, the t.bone has transformed the sound of our singers. I was expecting improved recordings but didn't expect the difference this mic made: much warmer and more rounded quality. I've been using it for a couple of years now and it seems extremely robust (although it never leaves the studio so it doesn't have a hard life.) And there's even something about the classic "BBC" appearance of the mic in it's anti-vibration sling that seems to bring out better performances: singers seem to have a sense that they need to do justice to what looks like a very professional piece of equipment. (I could be imagining that of course but psychology in the studio is important.)
Delivery was extremely quick (although Thomann's delivery is always impressive in my experience).

I wanted to start streaming and I knew I would need a good, clear sounding mic to satisfy any viewers I had. This mic has been perfect for me. I find it very clear and highly sensitive. Please understand, I am no audio pro and no doubt a mic costing 10x more will produce a better sound but for a live stream at 6,000 kb/s (Twitch) or the mono audio of a Facebook stream, this mic already produces far beyond the quality of the compressed stream audio.

When EQ'ing for the mic, I cut a lot from the lows and some from the mid and a slight boost at the high end. I add a tiny bit of reverb to thicken the signal and a compressor to level it all out nicely. I do this from a Behringer QX1002USB mixer. With a little time, I was able to get a very nice sound.

My only complaint is the grille material which seems very soft and fragile, I managed to dent it slightly with my thumb when moving the mic in the mount. This is partially my fault but something of which to be aware.

For a starter mic, you can't beat it. For the price, it's hard to believe. It may be simple, with no pickup pattern selector or low cut filter, but what can you expect for the money? It produces very clear, crisp sound at a price anyone can afford and that's what really mattered to me.